Research involving human subject participants must use valid and rigorous scientific methods, but first and foremost, it must be conducted in an ethical manner. This has not always been the case, as evidenced by the horrific breaches in human research ethics outlined in the Tuskegee and Belmont reports. Researchers have an ethical and legal obligation to protect the privacy and well-being of human subject participants by offering informed consent, especially to those in vulnerable populations such as children, prisoners, and individuals in mental health care settings.
According to the American Psychological Association (APA), informed consent typically entails describing the following eight study elements to participants: (1) purpose, (2) duration, (3) procedures, (4) right to decline or withdraw, (5) reasonably foreseeable factors pertinent to the decision to participate, (6) benefits or incentives, (7) confidentiality limits, and (8) contact information about rights (Walkup & Bock, 2009).
Not all studies have such clear ethical boundaries. Some studies may not seem to present as high stakes or be as involved as others. For example, when conducting a brief “person on the street” interview of just a few questions about health behaviors, is there as much need to detail all eight of the APA elements as there might be in a longitudinal study of individuals with a pernicious disease? This is a question that you, as a health professional, may need to consider and address in your daily work at various times in your career.
For this week’s Discussion, read the article by Walkup and Bock regarding their study on informed consent. Reflect on the authors’ assertions about what potential research participants want and need to know. How do these factors inform researchers in designing studies using human participants in terms of providing informed consent?
Address the following quesitons in your writing Are there boundaries to informed consent? Are there ever situations in which it is right to withhold information about a study from potential study participants? Justify your answer with specific examples.
The article to be used is attached
Please use APA in-text citation format.
How Much Is Too Much Information In The Informed Consent Process?
Length: 1 pages (275 Words)
Currently, informed consent is an important issue when selecting sample population for a clinical research. The consent requirement safeguards participants from harmful interventions and also ensures the participants participate willingly. It is stated in the Helsinki Declaration that any information given to the participants must be adequate and should meet the set standards. The information should be given orally and in written form, the participants should be informed about the purpose of the study, how it is designed, the benefits and hazards of participating in the study, voluntariness to participate in the study and finally the option of withdrawing from the study(Walkup& Bock, 2009).
* Once your purchase is processed by paypal you will be redirected back to this page and you'll have the option to download the paper. We'll also send the paper to your paypal email address as proof of purchase.Download Paper