Click here to study a vignette. (Attached Below)
On the basis of the vignette you read, write a paper supported by appropriate, peer-reviewed sources and case law that responds to the following:
Use resources from professional literature to support your analysis. The professional literature may include the Argosy University online library resources; relevant textbooks; peer-reviewed journal articles; and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, and .gov).
All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.
|Assignment Component||Proficient||Maximum Points Possible|
|Describe the psycho-legal standards and/or definitions for risk of dangerousness and insanity.||64|
|Identify and describe one or more landmark case(s) for each standard (at least two cases total).||64|
|On the basis of the information from the vignette, provide an opinion on the defendant's risk of dangerousness and insanity.||64|
|Discuss the potential ethical concerns that may be encountered by a forensic professional in the evaluation and assessment of each of these psycholegal issues.||40|
|Discuss the potential impact of an individual’s culture in the evaluation and assessment of each of these psycholegal issues.||40|
|Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension. Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.||Writing is generally clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, punctuation. Errors are few, isolated, and do not interfere with reader’s comprehension. Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.||28|
Assignment 2: Lasa: Assault In The City: Trial, Sentencing, And Appeal
Length: 8 pages (1500 Words)
From the scenario the defendant need to undergo a “risk assessment” to resolve important information that can be used to provide the court with enough proof that will be utilized as a part of the sentencing, for example, emotional well-being office situation and treatment. It is vital that Dr. Johnson separate all aspects of the past "risky conduct, for example, the "seriousness of past conduct, recognizable proof of conditions and jolts that trigger hazardous conduct, for example, substance mishandle, inebriation, relational relationships etc.
One landmark case that was connected to Dr. Johnson affirming with regards to the respondents "risk of dangerousness" Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) which set new benchmarks as to master affirming or his/her "feeling" of how unsafe the customer might be later on which states " a witness who is qualified as on master by learning, expertise, experience, preparing, or instruction may affirm as a sentiment or something else if (a) the experts scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact issue (b) the testimony depends on adequate realities or information (c) the declaration is the result of solid principals and methods and (d) the witness has applied the principals and methods reliability to the facts of the case”
* Once your purchase is processed by paypal you will be redirected back to this page and you'll have the option to download the paper. We'll also send the paper to your paypal email address as proof of purchase.Download Paper